Date Posted
20 October 2026 10:10 BST

Knowledge predators

By the Editor

In the hands of US tech corporations, the rapid spread of AI and other digital technologies is changing the shape of our societies. It is fuelling geopolitical tensions, challenging democracy and threatening to worsen the climate crisis while inflating what is increasingly seen as a vast and wasteful investment bubble.

“The Rulers", a new book by Cecilia Rikap, offers a deeply-researched, timely and readable analysis of what the power of the giants of Big Tech actually consists of.

It has become common for multinational corporations to create "knowledge monopolies" by turning knowledge into proprietary “intangible assets” and exploiting them for profit. The masters, however, are the "cloud giants": Microsoft, Google and Amazon.

IBM and other corporate giants of the past sought to dominate their industries by bringing the creation of knowledge in-house. Rikap shows that the cloud giants have taken a different approach: all three have created "ecosystems" of smaller entities which they do not actually own, but control in obvious and subtle ways with their concentrated knowledge, financial muscle and the other advantages of being the biggest players at the table. These ecosystems include startups, suppliers and customers as well as research institutes and parts of academia.

This “turbulent and subordinated periphery” generates knowledge which then flows one way: to the cloud giants. Their clouds are not only digital storehouses; they are also marketplaces for software and sites of connection between technologies. Control of clouds gives Microsoft, Google and Amazon a uniquely comprehensive or "panoptic" view of the digital economy which they exploit to extract super-profits and to shape its rules and evolution.

(The term “cloud” is itself a clever piece of corporate myth-making. It implies that these digital realms exist in some faraway virtual space, rather than being situated in huge buildings around the planet which are filled with servers and guarded by fences and cameras and which voraciously demand power, water and land.)

Rikap calls the cloud giants “knowledge predators” because they capture ideas created by many people in order to profiteer from them. Multinationals in other industries are willing (though not always happy) to be locked into these clouds on the cloud giants’ terms because access to the latest technologies and services helps them, in turn, to extract more value for themselves from their own industries. The "cloud giants" are very dynamic businesses, always looking for ways to stay ahead, and their sheer size and technological capability makes it very difficult indeed for other firms to catch up.

 

Into the public sector

The cloud giants are also locking states into their digital infrastructure and bending public policy towards their own interests: for example, towards a vision of healthcare which is data-driven, highly individualised and based on expensive treatments for those who can afford them, rather than on tackling the social and environmental causes of ill-health.

Meanwhile, behind a high wall of secrecy, the cloud giants are free to quietly collude with each other, and with select allies such as chip-maker Nvidia, to increase the dominance of each.

A deep irony, given the rhetoric about free markets and liberty which still pours out of America, is that the commercial empires of the US cloud giants are highly centralised and planned. These empires pose a geopolitical as well as an economic and a social problem, because they are so willing to ally themselves with domineering US foreign policy – a phenomenon unlikely to end when Trump goes.

Reading “The Rulers”, one can’t help but feel profound sadness at the great store of human ingenuity and organisational skill which, behind all the visioneering and the sci-fi gloss, is being used up on an essentially oligarchic project to extract more profit from society on behalf of a small minority who are already rich.

The cost of this project is to our privacy and the free evolution of knowledge, to our hopes of containing the climate crisis and reducing inequality within society, and – for as long as policymakers keep treating Big Tech as a helpmate rather than a predator - to public trust in democracy itself.

 

What we can do 

At the end of the book, Rikap considers existing remedies for the power of the cloud giants. Competition law is not well-suited to breaking up monopolies which cross over industries and can exert power without ownership. Digital regulation can limit the extraction of rent but does not unpick its causes. Even China’s more ambitious alternative – building its own digital ecosystem under the eye of the state – relies heavily on copying US technology.

Rikap argues for public institutions to cut their ties with the cloud giants and other intellectual monopolies, and for the creation instead of a truly “public cloud” run by an autonomous international body and funded by taxing the profits of intellectual monopolies.

She suggests that this public cloud could focus at first on providing public services related to healthcare. This makes sense, given the clear benefits of pooling knowledge to create public goods and the obvious problem of healthcare being captured by private rent-seekers.

She also calls for the creation of an international research institution, under democratic governance, which can develop frontier digital technologies in the public interest, rather than leaving the cloud giants to capture public research for private ends. Such an institution might attract many of the brilliant minds which are being lucratively wasted at the moment in the service of Silicon Valley and its investors.

More broadly, Rikap calls for a resurgence in democratic planning at local, national and international level, which digital tools could be used to support, and for democratic conversations about which technologies we actually want and need.

Corporate power has become a massive obstacle to a more just world. “The Rulers” offers invaluable analysis of one of its mightiest and most insidious forms.

 

The publisher's page for "The Rulers" is here. You can read an article that Rikap wrote for Critical Takes last year here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments
Please login or register to comment:
Register
Top posts
How corporate power dominates farming
9 January 2026
Knowledge predators
20 October 2026
Tax, market power and global value chains
7 October 2024
How Big Tech lobbies to water down EU laws
5 February 2026
Corporate discursive power and human rights
18 February 2026
Corporate power and neoliberal amnesia
20 May 2025
Challenging complex problems together
10 April 2025
Making corporations account for harm
8 September 2026
Why corporate power is a feminist issue
13 August 2024
"Their economic power has never been greater."
3 June 2025
Land, sugar and corporate power
12 November 2024
The Salmon and the Tomato
25 June 2026
The problem with multistakeholderism
8 May 2024
So what should we do about corporate power?
8 July 2025
Why the UN Tax Convention is advancing
5 March 2026
Growing profits on a damaged planet
12 June 2024
Welcome to Critical Takes on Corporate Power!
3 April 2024
Democratic public ownership: an idea whose time has come
8 July 2024
Tackling agrifood monopolies in African countries
9 September 2025
From mining transparency to justice and equity
5 February 2025
Taking Uber to court and winning
8 November 2024
Big Tech's political push in Europe
29 January 2025
Where next for a business and human rights treaty?
20 March 2025
How "national champions" are reshaping the global meat industry
17 April 2025
Alternatives to corporate power: farming and food production
8 April 2026
Strengthening trade union power in Kenya's tea plantations
27 June 2024
The US cuts a big tax loophole into Pillar Two
27 January 2026
Public data, private capture: the case of India
23 July 2025
How to break open Big Tech
10 April 2024
Nearly half a billion tonnes of plastic
17 September 2026
A UN convention is a big deal for tax justice
3 April 2024
Unhealthy diets, outsized profits
29 October 2024
A UN report on ending poverty has big ideas on corporate power
15 May 2026
The outlook for tax justice in Africa
13 February 2025
Europe’s new due diligence law falls short
24 April 2024
Time to revive the UN commission for multinationals?
15 August 2025
The new fight against monopoly power
15 May 2024
Alternatives to corporate power: medicines
16 April 2026
How Big Tech turns knowledge into power
16 June 2025
Pushing back against corporate power in the US
3 April 2024
Curbing monopoly power: what happens now?
20 February 2025
The problem with pension fund capitalism
6 May 2025
Don’t just report whatever corporations say!
21 October 2025
Recapturing the state from corporate power
15 June 2026
Ten proposals for curbing corporate power
9 July 2026
Challenging Big Oil in the North Sea
13 May 2025
Towards justice in the mining of critical minerals
28 October 2025
Alternatives to corporate power: public development banks
17 March 2026
2025 is going to be a bumpy year
6 January 2025
Tracking corporate abuses around the world
27 May 2026
How Britain backs up Big Oil abroad
9 October 2026
The "strategic duplicity" of the Big Four
11 November 2025
The United Nations, tax and human rights
19 November 2024
How profit flows from FDI deepen the North-South divide
17 September 2024
Monopolies of knowledge are making the rich richer
17 December 2024
Oxfam thinks big about curbing corporate power
26 November 2024
To achieve radical change, we must work differently
17 September 2025
Concentrated corporate power: a problem for workers
22 May 2024